Complexity theory and industrial cluster: case of a software cluster
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48168/ccee012021-003Keywords:
Cluster, Complexity theory, cluster softwareAbstract
Both the concept of industrial cluster and complexity theory are not new topics; however, both have emerged in the literature of the last 20 years as a different form of organization, in the case of the cluster, and focus on the case of complexity theory. This document seeks to introduce complexity theory as an instrument for analyzing industrial clusters. For this, the case study methodology is used on the experience in the construction of a cluster of information and communication technologies. The work results show how the characteristics of complexity theory have strong similarities with the dynamics of clusters, which helps to understand these dynamics. It is concluded that complexity theory is a tool that becomes more fundamental for understanding and supporting the development of these agglomerations as the market dynamics and technological advances take place.
References
Arthur, W. B. (1996). Increasing returns and the new world of business. Harvard Business Review, July-August.
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of co-operation. London: New Basic Books.
Bak, P., & Chen, K. (1991). Self-organised criticality. Scien¬tific American, January.
Basant, R. (2006). “Bangalore cluster: Evolution, Growth and Challenges”. Working Paper 2006-05-02. Indian Institute of Management. Ahmedabad – 380 015.
Becattini, G. (1990). “The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion”. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini y W. Sengenberger (Eds.). Industrial districts and interfirm co-operation in Italy. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
Becattini, G. (1997). Prato: Storia di una Citta ‘: il distretto industriale . Florencia: Le Monnier.
Becattini, G. (1998). Distretti industriali e made in Italy. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
Boisot, M. (1998). Knowledge assets: Securing competi¬tive advantage in the information economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chetty S. (1996). The case study method for research in small- and médium – sized firms. International small business journal, vol. 5, octubre – diciembre.
Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and Postmodernism. Lon¬dres: Routledge.
Dosi, G., & Orsenigo, L. (1985). Order and change: An exploration of markets, institutions and technology in industrial dynamics. Brighton: SPRU, discussion paper, No. 32.
Florida, R. (2005). “Cities and the creative class”. Abing¬don: Routledge.
Fujita, M., Venables, A., & Krugman, P. (1999). The spa¬tial economy: Cities, regions and international trade. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Gibbons, M., & Metcalfe, J. (1986). Technology, variety and competition. In: I. Prigogine, & M. Sanglier (Eds), Laws of nature and human conduct. Brussels: Acade¬mie Royal Belgique.
Hall, R. (1999). Rearranging risks and rewards in a supply chain. Journal of General Management, 4 (3), Spring.
Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.
Jacobs, J. (1969). “Economy of cities”. New York: Vintage.
Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe. Oxford: Prensa de la Universidad de Oxford.
Krugman, P. (1995). “Development, geography and eco¬nomic theory”. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lindqvist, G. (2009). “Disentangling clusters: agglomer¬ation and proximity effects”. Disertasión PhD tesis en Stockholm School of Economics. Jönköping University, 2009.
Malmberg, A., Sölvell, Ö., & Zander, I. (1996). “Spatial clustering, local accumulation of kknowledge and firm competitiveness”. Geografisca annaler, 78 B(2), 85-97
Marshall, A. (1920). “Principles of Economics”. 8th ed. Vol. Libro IV. London: Macmillan.
Malone, T. W., & Laubacher, R. J. (1998). The dawn of the E-lance economy. Harvard Business Review, Septem¬ber-October, 149..
McKelvey, B. (1999). Visionary leadership vs. distributed intelligence: Strategy, micro-evolution, complexity. EI¬ASM Workshop on Complexity and Organisation. Brus¬sels, June.
Nicolis, G., & Prigogine, I. (1989). Exploring complexity: An introduction. New York: Freeman.
Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of com¬petition. Harvard Business Review, November-Decem¬ber
Norberg, A. (1992). “The origins of the Electronics Indus¬try on the Pacific Coast”. Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers 64. Num. 9. pp 1314 – 1322.
Piore, M., & Sabel, C. (1984). “The second industrial di¬vide: possibilities for prosperity”. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Pyke, F., Becattini, G., & Sengenberger, W. (1990). “In¬dustrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy”. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
Ramírez, B., Osuna, J. & Suástegui, B. (2012). “Vincula¬cion Uniersidad – Sociedad y el modelo de la Triple Hélice”. XIII Asamblea General de ALAFEC. Asociación Latinoamericana de Facultades y Escuelas de Con¬taduria y Administración. Obtenido en: http://132.248.164.227/alafec/docs/asambleas/xiii/ ponencias/educacion/pdf/E_06.pdf
Rosegrant, S. & Lampe, D. (1992). “Route 128: Lessons from Boston´s High-Tech Community”. New York: Ba¬sic Books.
Sabel, C. F. (1989). Flexible specialisation and the re-emer¬gence of regional economies. In: P. Hirst, & J. Zeitlin (Eds), Reversing industrial decline? Oxford: Berg.
Shelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehaviour. New York: Norton & Company
Stacey, R. D. (1995). The science of complexity: An al¬ternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal, 16.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Ciencias de la Complejidad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.