Biosemiotics as one of the Sciences of Complexity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48168/cc012020-002

Keywords:

History of science, Philosophy of science, Epistemology, Complexity Sciences, Communication of living systems

Abstract

This article raises a thesis: biosemiotics can be considered as one of the sciences of complexity, alongside the other already classical and well-known sciences such as chaos, non-equilibrium thermodynamics, complex networks and others. For this, the state of the art in the relations between biosemiotics and complexity is elaborated, a state of the question, indeed, very limited. The general strategy consists of presenting a general, scientific, philosophical and historical picture that explains at the same time what biosemiotics consists of and what its particularities are. In all cases, the idea is clear: signs are real phenomena typical of living systems. And the sciences of complexity are life sciences.

References

Auletta, G., (2010). Cognitive Biology. Dealing with Information from Bacteria to Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Baluska, F., Mancuso, S., Vokmann, D., (2006). Communication in plants. Neuronal Aspects of Plant Life. Springer Verlag

Barbieri, M., (2009). “A Short History of Biosemiotics”, en: Biosemiotics 2: 221-245; doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-009-9042-8

Barbieri, M., (2008). “What is biosemiotics?”, en: Biosemiotics, 1: 1-3 (Editorial); disponible en: file:///C:/Users/user/Documents/Papers%20CEM/what%20is%20biosemiotics.pdf

Barbieri, M., (2008). “Biosemiotics: a new understanding of life”, en: Naturwissenshaften, vol.95, págs. 577-599; doi: 10.1007/s00114-008-0363-x

Barbieri, M., (Ed.), (2007). Introduction to Biosemiotics. A New Biological Synthesis. Springer Verlag

Botkin, D. B., (1990). Armonías discordantes. Una ecología para el siglo XXI. Madrid: Acento Editorial

Brier, S., (2016). “Biosemiotics Antihumanism: Why culture is an extension of biology and a self-organizing system of meaning”, en: Cybernetics and Human Knowing – A journal of second order cybernetics, autopoiesis and cyber-semiotics, 24(2): 93-97

Carroll, S. B., (2006). Endless Forms Most Beautiful. The New Science of Evo Devo. New York-London: W. W. Norton & Company

Damasio, A., (2019). El extraño orden de las cosas. La vida, los sentimientos y la creación de las culturas. Bogotá: Planeta

De Waals, F., (2005). Our Inner Ape. A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are the Way We Are. New York: Riverhead Books

Favareau, D., (2008). “The evolutionary history of biosemiotics”, en: M. Barbieri, (ed.) Introduction to Biosemiotics. Springer Verlag

Gálik, D., (2013). “Biosemiotics: A New Science of Biology?”, en: Filozofia 68, No. 10, págs. 859-867

Halpern, P., (2018). The Quantum Labyrinth. How Richard Feyman and John Wheeler Revolutionized Time and Reality. New York: Basic Books

Hoffmeyer, J., (2009). Biosemiotics: An Examination into the Signs of Life and the Life of Signs. University of Scranton Press

Hoffmeyer, J., (1997). Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Indiana: Indiana University Press

Hölldobler, B., y Wilson, E. O., (1996). Viaje a las hormigas. Una historia de exploración científica. Barcelona: Crítica-Grijalbo Mondadori

Jablonka, E., Lamb, M., (2005). Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. The MIT Press

Kauffman, S., (2016). Humanity in a Creative Universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Kauffman, S., (1993). The Origins of Order. Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Kosoy, M, Kosoy, R., (2018). “Complexity and biosemiotics in evolutionary ecology of zoonotic infectious agents”, en: Evol. Appl., abril, 11(4): 394-403; doi: 10.1111/eva.12503

Kull, K., (2000). “An introduction to phytobiosemiotics: semiotic botany and vegetative signs systems”, en: Sign Systems Studies, 28: 326-350

Kull, K., (2009). “Biosemiotics: to know, what life knows”, en: Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 16(3/4): 81-88

Landauer, R., (1991). “Information is Physical”, en: Physics Today 44, 5, 23; doi: https://doi.org/10-1063/1.881299

Mäekivi, N., Magnus, R., (2020). “Ecosemiotics and Zoosemiotic Perspectives”, en: Biosemiotics, 13 (1-7); doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-020-09382-z

Maldonado, C. E., (2020). Teoría de la información y y complejidad. La tercera revolución científica. Bogotá: Universidad El Bosque-Desde Abajo

Maldonado, C. E., (2018a) “Biological Hypercomputation and Degrees of Freedom”, en: Complexity in Biological and Physical Systems - Bifurcations, Solitons and Fractals, R. en: López-Ruiz (Ed.), London, IntechOpen, ISBN 978-1-78923-051-2, pp. 83-93, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.73179

Maldonado, C. E., (2018b) “Quantum Physics and Consciousness: A (Strong) Defense of Panpsychism”, en: Trans/from/acao, Edicao especial, Vol. 41, pp. 101-118, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2018.v4lesp.07.p101

Maldonado, C. E., Gómez-Cruz, N., (2015) “Biological Hypercomputation: A New Research Problem in Complexity Theory”, en: Complexity, Vol. 20, Issue 4, págs. 8-18

Marais, A., Adams, B., Ringsmth, A. K., Ferretti, M., Gruber, J. M., Hendrikx, R., Schuld, M., Smith, S. L., Sinayskiy, I., Krüger, T. P. J., Petruccione, F., and van Grondelle, R., (2018). “The Future of Quantum Biology”, en: Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 14 de noviembre, vol. 15, issue 148, 20180640; doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0640

Margulis, L., Sagan, D., (2003). Captando genomas. Una teoría sobre el origen de las especies. Barcelona: Kairós

Meyers, R. A., (Ed.), (2009). Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Vols. 1-10. Springer Verlag

Moore, D. S., (2017). The Developing Genome. An Introduction to Behavioral Epigenetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Sebeok, T. A., (1994). Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press

Sharov, A. A., (1992). “Biosemiotics: Functional-Evolutionary Approach to the Analysis of the Sense of Information”, en: Sebeok, T. A., and Umiker-Sebeok, J., (eds.), Biosemiotics: The Semiotic Web, New York: Mourton de Gruyter, págs. 345-373

Smethan, G., (2010). Quantum Buddhism. Dancing in Emptiness. Reality Revealed at the Interface of Quantum Physics and Buddhist Philosophy. Lulu.Com

Solé, R., and Goodwin, B., (2000). Signs of Life. How Complexity Pervades Biology. New York: Perseus Books

Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. A., (Eds.), (2014). Enaction : Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. A Bradford Book

Thom, R., (1990). Esbozo de una semiofísica. Física aristotélica y la teoría de la catastrófes. Barcelona: Gedisa

Varela, F., (2000). El fenómeno de la vida. Santiago de Chile: Dolmen Ediciones

Varela, F., Thompson, E., Rosch, E., (1992). The Embodied Mind. Massachusetts: The MIT Press

Watson, P., (2017). Convergencias. El orden subyacente en el corazón de la ciencia. Barcelona: Crítica

Wheeler, W., (2006). The Whole Creature. Complexity, Biosemiotics and the Evolution of Culture. London: Lawrence & Wishart

Published

2020-11-23

How to Cite

Maldonado, C. E. (2020). Biosemiotics as one of the Sciences of Complexity. Journal Sciences of Complexity, 1(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.48168/cc012020-002

Issue

Section

Research articles